Want to read more? Subscribe Now or Sign In
Hide ( X )
  • THE CRIME REPORT - Your Complete Criminal Justice Resource

  • Investigative News Network
  • Welcome to the Crime Report. Today is


How New York City Really Reduced Mass Incarceration

February 26, 2013 06:33:45 am
Comments (2)

By Kara Dansky and Glenn E. Martin

In a report recently published by the Brennan Center for Justice, two nationally renowned criminologists examined the connection between arrest rates in New York City and the state’s overall correctional populations.

The report, How New York City Reduced Mass Incarceration: A Model for Change?, makes two essential findings:

(1) A reduction in felony arrests in New York City over the course of the last 10-15 years caused a dramatic reduction in state-wide prison, jail, probation, and parole populations without increasing crime, and

(2) The state’s correctional population would have declined further if the state had not enacted draconian laws in the 1990s that significantly increased the amount of time people spend in prison.

That a state can show massive reductions in correctional populations brought about by a city’s decision to lock up fewer of its residents is good news.

It confirms what many reformers have been saying for years: we can find creative ways to safely reduce our nation’s costly addiction to incarceration.

But the New York City Police Department (NYPD) made other changes in its policing strategies during the same time period, causing confusion about how the report data should be construed.

While the NYPD reduced arrests for nonviolent felonies, it started arresting more people for nonviolent misdemeanors. Some, including representatives of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, have suggested that the report should be read as an endorsement of this “broken windows theory” as a strategy for reducing mass incarceration.

Nothing could be farther from reality.

There is no reliable evidence showing that “broken windows” has reduced correctional populations or brought down crime.  There is however, a vast body of evidence showing that “broken windows” has ravaged certain New York neighborhoods—namely those with high concentrations of poor people and people of color.

It is no coincidence that New York State has the largest network of Alternative to Incarceration (ATI) programs in the country and, that unlike other large states such as California, Florida and Texas, it has seen crime and incarceration rates plummet simultaneously—improving public safety and saving much-needed revenue.
New York has clearly reaped the rewards from the “Classification/Alternatives to Incarceration Act,” which was established in 1984 to provide funding for an array of ATI programs.

In addition, the Drug Treatment Alternative to Prison program, ultimately expanded to prosecutor’s offices statewide, was established by the Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office to divert thousands of prison-bound defendants into treatment programs.

Decades worth of research documents the fact that people in poor communities of color are at greater risk of entering the criminal justice system due to the scarcity of prevention programs, early intervention programs and alternatives to incarceration.

There are also successful examples of creative programs and practices outside of New York that have promoted alternatives to incarceration.

For example, the Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) pilot program in Seattle allows police officers to send people directly to treatment rather than arresting them. This is a promising model of what local agencies can accomplish by keeping people out of the criminal justice system and giving them access to the community resources they need.

Another example is San Diego, which has given police the ability to routinely refer kids in trouble to diversion programs, rather than funneling them into the criminal justice system.

The Seattle and San Diego examples suggest that we are beginning to see the value in investments in effective public safety programs while shifting away from the culture based on punishment that fueled our addiction to incarceration.

The Brennan Center report offers a valuable message about the power of local communities and their abilities to reduce crime and increase public safety while simultaneously reducing correctional populations.

We should demand that our elected officials and policy makers at local, state and federal levels find even smarter, more efficient, and fairer ways of safely reducing their jails and prisons.

It’s a wise investment in people and in the communities where they live.

Kara Dansky is Senior Counsel, American Civil Liberties Union. Glenn E. Martin is Vice President of Public Affairs, Fortune Society. They welcome comments from readers.

« Article List

Posted by Svetlana
Friday, April 05, 2013 02:25

I am interested in wrintig a short Blog on the likelihood that felons will be the first to be compelled to receive a human implant tracking chip. I won’t go into a religious rant but I do have to write about what I believe. This is just as much a secular issue as it is a religious issue and I can lean secular. But it won’t be much more than speculation. Still, first it’s the sex offenders, then the violent felons, then all felons, then all citizens.

Posted by Howard Abadinsky
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 03:10

The drop in NYC crime roughly approximates a reduction in the NYC public school population— fewer young men in the crime-prone cohort results in less crime.

TCR at a Glance

The New Politics of the Drug War

special report May 26, 2016

As presidential candidates focus on the opioid epidemic, grassroots initiatives are transforming the national debate about drugs.

Life After Prison: Opting In or Opting Out

special report May 23, 2016

In Part 4 of our podcast series, Lorenzo Brooks faces the challenges of navigating a now-unfamiliar world he left behind when he went to ...