Want to read more? Subscribe Now or Sign In
Hide ( X )
  • THE CRIME REPORT - Your Complete Criminal Justice Resource

  • Investigative News Network
  • Welcome to the Crime Report. Today is

Viewpoints

Elections 2012

It’s Time to Address Federal Prison Overcrowding

November 14, 2012 06:44:54 am
Comments (9)

By Matthew Mangino

The most expensive presidential election in history is over. In a campaign dominated by the economy, criminal justice issues played literally no role in either candidate’s campaign. 

From a political point of view, ignoring criminal justice issues was the right way to go.  According to a Gallup Poll conducted this fall, less than one percent of Americans believed crime was the nation's most pressing problem.

There is no question that violent crime has fallen over the last decade and a half. However, we live in a country where about 14,500 people were murdered in 2011, a significant majority by gun fire.

Every year, thousands of innocent people are victims of burglary, robbery and aggravated assault.

More than 6.6 million people are in prison, jails or under community supervision. Incarceration alone costs taxpayers $65 billion a year. The sputtering economy, which was the focus of both national campaigns, has forced state legislators across the country to choose between being “tough on crime” or raising taxes.

According to CBS News, in 2011, fifteen states passed significant sentencing reform legislation with an eye on cutting costs.

Now, President Barack Obama and a politically divided congress must tackle dangerously overcrowded federal prisons.

A recent report released by the Government Accountability Office, Growing Inmate Crowding Negatively Affects Inmates, Staff, and Infrastructure, found that the Federal Bureau of Prisons operated at 39 percent over recommended capacity nationwide.

From 2006 to 2011, prison population grew at 9.5 percent, outpacing the 7 percent growth in infrastructure and new beds. Prisons are staffed at 90 percent, the minimum safe standard, reported the Madison Times.

“This severe crowding has resulted in double and triple bunking inmates,” Harley G. Lappin, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons told the U.S. Sentencing Commission in 2011.

“As of January 2011, 94 percent of high security inmates were double bunked, and 16 percent of medium security inmates and almost 82 percent of low security inmates were triple bunked or housed in space not originally designed for inmate housing.”

Overcrowding can create dangerous conditions for inmates and prison staff. 

The inability to get into programming can adversely affect an inmate in several important ways.  First, mental health issues, drug and alcohol or anger issues are not being addressed.

Second, inmates who want and need the programming begin to get frustrated, and that can lead to acting out.  Third, some inmates without programming head to the streets without addressing their criminogenic needs.

Cramped quarters and a lack of privacy can lead to a heightened level of tension in correction facilities.  In turn, as tension grows the incidence of violence against staff and fellow inmates increase.  With minimum staffing and growing supervision responsibilities, corrections officers and inmates are more vulnerable. 

Overcrowding and understaffing is a recipe for disaster.

"If you start cramming more and more people into a confined space, you're going to create more tensions and problems," David Maurer the GAO's Director of Homeland Security and Justice told The Huffington Post.

"It creates the possibility that someone's going to snap and have a violent incident."

Overcrowding itself can exacerbate the crowding problem. 

For instance, an inmate with mental health problems living in an overcrowded and unsettled facility will tend to act out.  The conduct may be nothing more than defiant or annoying, but misconducts will begin to mount. 

An inmate who may have thrived in another environment is now removed from consideration for early release and further contributes to the overcrowding crisis.

The federal prison budget increased from $6.4 billion in 2011 to $6.6 billion this year.  Next year the budget is set at more than $6.8 billion.  Even with the increase, the Obama Administration is not just blindly throwing money at the overcrowding problem.

This year’s budget provides $153 million in prisoner reentry and jail diversion programs, including $80 million for the Second Chance Act and $52 million for problem-solving grants supporting drug courts, mentally ill offender assistance, and other problem-solving initiatives. 

The Obama Administration has acknowledged that, with 2.3 million people in prisons nationwide and 1 in 32 American adults under some form of correctional supervision, a new direction is needed.

One potential direction might include reining in federal over-criminalization. A little more than a century ago there were a handful of federal criminal statutes. As of 2008, there were more than 4,000 federal crimes.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the growing number of federal crimes is responsible for the rising number of people sentenced to federal prison.  The U.S. population grew by 36 percent over the last 30 years. 

The total federal prison population grew more than eightfold—twice the growth rate of the state prison population.

Investing in reentry services on the back-end might influence the cycle of reincarceration. 

However, only bold—forward thinking—initiatives on the front-end will lead to real and meaningful reductions in prison populations.

Matthew T. Mangino is an attorney and the former district attorney for Lawrence County, Pennsylvania. He recently completed a six year term on the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole.  You can reach him at www.mattmangino.com and follow him on twitter @MatthewTMangino. He welcomes comments from readers. 

« Article List

Posted by Scott Wiele
Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:16

I studied law and was victimized by a rogue FBI agent,.Boy ,do I have stories about due process denied.Anyone,and I mean anyone who wants to debate me on the federal play book on how to extort a plea,I will gladly accept.Hint: If you go to trial and try and defend yourself,you are facing twice the sentence.You would think this would make at least some judges a little uncomfortable.And the ubiquitous threat to incarcerate a totally innocent spouse is another extra- constitutional game changer and used in virtually every case.Ever wonder why the federal conviction rate is 97 per cent and China and Russia are 98 and 99 respectively?I just told you.

Posted by Pete
Sunday, April 07, 2013 11:17

Things will only get worse with sequestration. The DOJ is suffling funds around to avoid further staff cuts in the BOP. The potential result could be very dangerous for staff, inmates and ultimately the public. The problems described so well in this article will be multipled by additional funding cuts.

Posted by Fem
Sunday, February 17, 2013 08:53

What I do not understand is why do non-violent criminals have to be housed in a prison?? Specifically financial criminals, give these people house arrest that way the tax payers are not giving out of their pockets to take care of these people. Wouldn’t that make more sense? I am referring to financial (white collar), not drug related crimes or violent crimes.

Posted by al
Monday, December 31, 2012 12:06

Thank you for you for you’re professionalism in addressing a growing problem that not a lot of people want to talk about. Hope this type of reporting is done more often, again thank you.

Posted by Matthew Mangino
Saturday, November 17, 2012 12:34

Sherry your story is all too familiar. There are plenty of people in prison who belong in prison. There are also many who should have long ago gone home. The system needs to do a better job of figuring out which offenders are a threat to public safety. For those who are not a threat the system needs to find alternatives to long term incarceration. Setting politics aside, the system needs to explore meaningful diversions that hold offenders accountable and do not waste increasingly scarce resources.

Posted by Sherry
Friday, November 16, 2012 10:50

Thank you so much for your time getting this important message out there..This is a subject that the majority tends to not even think about..these men and women are forgotten, unless it comes home to you. There is a six part documentary on YouTube by Walter Cronkite perfectly explaining what is really happening…My brother has a life sentence with no parole for a conspiracy charge that he was barely involved in…because of the mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines..He need to sit down for awhile and get in touch with his addicted soul, but not for the rest of precious life…these laws are criminal…families are suffering..think about the future generations..there has to be a better way..please contact me if anyone knows how I can get help for my brother…his story needs to be heard.

Posted by Linda Connelly
Friday, November 16, 2012 02:36

You are exactly right in your assessment. We must change the front-end sentencing as well as enhance re-entry services. The majority of inmates in custody are substance abusers and until and unless we address this, recidivism and the extraordinary cost of incarceration will continue to drain critically needed resources in our communities. I am a 38 year criminal justice practitioner and began my career as a correctional officer in the Federal Bureau of Prions. Change is well overdue and we need the media to continue to focus on this issue. Thank you for your article.

Posted by William B.
Wednesday, November 14, 2012 06:54

This problem will not be solved until Congress is forced to make a decision between being “tough on crime” or raising taxes. In this political climate I think public safety will take a back seat to raising taxes. I think the issue has come full cirle—a politician would rather be labelled “soft” than a “tax and spender” President Obama should strike while the iron is hot an push congress to roll back it overcriminalizing ways.

Posted by Brian
Wednesday, November 14, 2012 09:07

The extent of overcrowding in federal prison is making a riot in some facility very likely. When inmates get frustrated and have ongoing access to one another small seemingly insignificant issues escalate into violence. The federal government needs to act now to diffuse what will become an increasingly violent situation.

TCR at a Glance