Want to read more? Subscribe Now or Sign In
Hide ( X )
  • THE CRIME REPORT - Your Complete Criminal Justice Resource

  • Investigative News Network
  • Welcome to the Crime Report. Today is

Viewpoints

Our ‘War on Drugs’: Eugenics Without Surgery?

April 17, 2012 04:04:00 am
Comments (2)

By Erik Roskes

In their recent back-to-back columns in Time magazine, Fareed Zakaria and Touré describe two complementary—but far from complimentary—views of contemporary America.

Touré focuses his microscope on the everyday experience of young black men and boys in America, in his poignant but all-too-realistic piece on “eight talking points about the potentially fatal condition of being black.” 

As a white man, some of these resonate (when stopped by the police, “follow all instructions, don’t say anything, keep your cool”), while others are utterly outside of my personal experience (“Being black could turn an ordinary situation into a life-or-death moment even if you’re doing nothing wrong”). 

Zakaria’s macroscopic view will be very familiar to readers of this blog and of The Crime Report. The United States incarcerates seven to ten times as many people per capita as compared with other developed nations, and, Zakaria writes, “even developing countries that are well known for their crime problems have a third of U.S. numbers. Mexico has 208 prisoners per 100,000 citizens, and Brazil has 242.”

Why do we do this? 

In large part, Zakaria suggests that this relates to our assiduously waged—but long-ago-lost— war on drugs. 

Zakaria cites data showing that half of all inmates are currently incarcerated on drug offenses.  In my experience, more than half of the remainder are also incarcerated on crimes committed in the service of addiction: burglary, robbery, bank robbery, assault, felony murder.  

And these inmates disproportionately come from segments of society that suffer various, often multiple, deprivations: social deprivation, educational deprivation, nutritional deprivation, cultural deprivation, cognitive deprivation. 

Since drug addiction—or at least being caught, prosecuted and convicted for addiction and related crimes—disproportionately affects deprived segments of our society, I submit that our incarceration addiction is tantamount to eugenics without surgery.  

For those with short memories, eugenics was a system of beliefs and practice that asserted that certain societal and racial subgroups were superior to others.

In the U.S., these ideas fostered restrictions on immigration of those believed to be of inferior stock (sound familiar?) and ultimately on the forced sterilization of those deemed unfit to reproduce. 

Lest we think this is distant history, the organized practice only stopped in the 1970s. Amazingly, as recently as January 2012, an appellate court overturned a court order in Massachusetts that would have resulted in the sterilization of a defendant before the court.

In my view, the selective incarceration of young minority men due to addictions that they often develop in their socioeconomically and culturally deprived worlds removes them from society in part because we view them as the “bogeyman,” and as unfit to be full partners with us. 

This is eugenics in different form. 

Erik Roskes, a regular blogger for The Crime Report, is a forensic psychiatrist and serves on the teaching faculty in the Psychiatry Department at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. The opinions expressed are those of the author only, and do not represent those of any of Dr. Roskes’ employers or consultees, including the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. He welcomes readers’ comments.  Dr. Roskes’ website is http://mysite.verizon.net/eroskes.

Email this post »

« Article List

Posted by erik roskes
Tuesday, April 24, 2012 06:11

I understand your point, and I do not doubt the good intentions of the likely well-meaning folks in Mass. But my point in this and other posts of mine is that good intentions may lead to bad ends – and this is exactly what happened in Nazi Germany – they started by sterilizing the “insane” and “feebleminded” as threats to the Aryan Race, then moved to killing them, then moved to killing other purported threats to Aryan supremacy. I do not see the US headed there, but there are elements in our own country who worship the swastika still….

But my main point – that the drug war specifically targets the deprived among us – is true regardless of whether you buy my metaphor.

Posted by Paul R Gormley
Sunday, April 22, 2012 09:25

There is a slightly misleading comment in the article, the passage “Lest we think this is distant history, the organized practice only stopped in the 1970s. Amazingly, as recently as January 2012, an appellate court overturned a court order in Massachusetts that would have resulted in the sterilization of a defendant before the court” does not refer to a criminal defendant but rather the defendant in an action before a probate court addressing the issues of an allegedly incompetent woman (due to severe mental illness). This was not an attempt at eugenics but rather a clash of values, standards, and objectives (should a profoundly mentally ill woman be protected from pregnancy? should an unborn child be protected from that parentage and life? does the state have any ability to act to protect either or both of those people? if it has the power, is it ethically and morally appropriate to ever impose it? and much more). No on e"meant" her harm and reasonable minds may differ on this issue.

TCR at a Glance

Smack Madness

April 16, 2014

Have the media and policymakers overblown the latest heroin “epidemic?”

How Red Tape Snarls Prison Rape Act

special report April 10, 2014

The DOJ’s insistence on state compliance with 288 regulatory standards keeps the program’s implementation in limbo, say critics