Want to read more? Subscribe Now or Sign In
Hide ( X )
  • THE CRIME REPORT - Your Complete Criminal Justice Resource

  • Investigative News Network
  • Welcome to the Crime Report. Today is

Inside Criminal Justice

Crisis in the Family Court

December 28, 2009 09:00:11 am
Comments (7)

court[1]Rising custody disputes and child care issues are overwhelming already beleaguered family court judges in New York and other states.

Family courts nationwide are grappling with a caseload crisis that delays decisions on critical issues for parents and children involving abuse and neglect, custody and visitation.  Although especially problematic in major urban areas, the Empire State as a whole has been struggling with this precarious situation, leading the New York State Senate Judiciary Committee to recently recommend the addition of 21 new family court judges to the bench.  This would be the first significant increase in the state's family court judgeships in over three decades.


      Most experts believe this is long overdue. According to a report prepared by the New York State Senate Committee on the Judiciary, the 143 judges currently mandated  by state law handled over 2.1 million appearances statewide in 2008. The report, entitled “Kids and Families Can’t Wait-The Urgent Case for New Family Court Judgeships, ”  predicted a 26 percent increase in appearances, to a staggering 2.6 million. The burden of current  caseloads is already felt throughout the system.  In New York City, for example, an average of 3.5 minutes is spent on a family court appearance.

      The recommendation is currently moving through the state’s legislative process. The bill (A8957) is now currently before the state assembly, after passage by the State Senate in September.  Even if the bill becomes law, the committee made clear it won’t be enough.  It recommended that adding at least 18 more Family Court judgeships once the state’s budget crisis eases. 

      New York State is far from alone in its family court crisis.  Most major urban and larger jurisdictions have problems with heavy family court caseloads and would benefit from more judges, said Peter Salem, Executive Director of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) in Madison, Wis.  

      “It’s always a good thing when there are more judges to help families, and more judges dedicated to the family bench who have the opportunity to obtain training and an in-depth understanding of the dynamics of the families that appear before them,” said Salem.  “Not having enough judges and resources leads to delays.  That’s a problem.  People are going through major life crises and children with often serious issues often have to be put on hold.”

      Putting more judges on the bench only begins to resolve some of the deep systemic problems in the way New York deals with family issues. 

      “I’m picking trial dates for the end of next summer and it’s not because the judges are being irresponsible or lazy, it’s just their calendar availability,” said Theodor Liebmann, Clinical Professor of Law and Attorney-in-Charge of the Child Advocacy Clinic at Hofstra Law School.  “There are families and agencies that will have to wait until next summer to get a finding on abuse or neglect cases.  These months constitute substantial chunks of the impacted kids’ lives.”  

      For example, if a trial date is scheduled for summer 2010, there is still no guarantee that the case will be heard on the scheduled day.  “When a child is removed from their home, (he or she) is entitled to a hearing in three days,” noted Liebmann. “So to the judges who put on cases eight months ago, those newer cases take priority”---resulting, he added, in even more delay.

      Family Court judges are working under exceedingly difficult and dire circumstances. “My workload has doubled,” Judge W. Dennis Duggan, who has handled family court in Albany for 16 years, wrote in an e-mail. “The work day has remained the same.  No person can do twice as much work in the same amount of time and keep the same level of quality.”  

Staggering Workloads

      Duggan, who is past president of the New York State Family Court Judges’ Association, added that the workload has grown to “staggering” proportions in the years he has served on the bench.  Among the consequences, he noted, are “seat of our pants” judgments.  Duggan is also a board member of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ).

      Elsewhere in the nation, family court judges argue that more resources as well as more judgeships are needed. “Judges are now case managers, not exclusively decision makers,”  said the AFCC’s Salem.  “(We need) interdisciplinary programs, dispute resolution programs, legal information, education programs and drug treatment programs.”

  According to Judge Karen Adam, a Superior Court Commissioner in Tucson, Arizona and chair of the NCJFCJ’s Juvenile and Family Law Advisory Committee, a well-informed family court judge needs to have “more than a passing knowledge of child development, mental health issues, domestic violence and high conflict family systems.”  

      In Tucson, Adam notes, almost 50 percent of all court filings are in probate, juvenile and family cases alone. Cases dealing with families mirror the Tucson statistic, comprising more than half the filings nationwide.

      Why is the number of family court cases increasing?

      Among the intriguing reasons are the explosion of custody disputes in cases with adoptive gay parents, and the high percentage of children born to single parents who are requesting child support. 

      According to Adam, the latter number is now about 40 percent nationally. “In big urban areas, it is higher,” she added. “Those cases are increasing nationally with requests for child support and formalized orders for custody and family time.  That’s increasing court time everywhere, and we need judges to handle them.” 

  In addition, self-represented litigants also cause a significant backlog in court calendars.

      “Family cases are at a dramatic increase,” said Andrew Schepard, Director of the Center for Children, Families and the Law and a professor at Hofstra University Law School in Hempstead, NY.  “More and more of these people are pro se.  Fewer people can afford lawyers, while the upper class has a trend toward distrust and want to do work themselves.”  

      Judge Adam agrees. “The interesting thing with family law is that half of the clients are self-represented,” she said.  “So you need to have more judicial management of these cases.”. 

      Child advocates and judges dealing with family and juvenile issues nationwide recommend a “one judge, one family” system with support resources as a way to provide case continuity and best deal with the complexities of such matters. 

      Experts agree that movement toward a unified court system in all jurisdictions is a trend that would be the ideal model practice in the best interest of children and families.

A Vermont Model

      One model is already on the books.  Since 1990, Vermont has had a unified family court system which is “working well,” according to Judge Amy Davenport, Chief Administrative Judge for the Vermont Trial Courts. “The same children may be involved in different types of cases,” she added, 

      “In family court, a judge has the opportunity to review all of the cases involving a child and his or her family.  For example, parents may be divorcing while at the same time a protective order is issued because there is domestic violence.  Then you have the 12 year-old child running away from home and now has there is a PINS (persons in need of supervision) case.  Having the same judge see all of these cases could be critical for that child.”

      In New York, judges would like to see similar models  put on the state’s agenda. Schepard, for instance, suggests establishing a family division within the New York State Supreme Court system that hears all family issues. “The only way to deal with inefficiencies is to have one judge.”

      At a time when budget cutbacks rule in state governments, this may be a hard sell.  But those same budget cutbacks have also helped create the instabilities and family problems that end up eventually in family courts.

      Schepard asks us therefore to spare a thought for the beleaguered judges who have to handle the sad and often tragic results.

      “They are doing heroic work in an impossible environment,” he says. 
 

Andrea S. Glenn is an attorney, a former public defender in Bronx County, and a freelance reporter with a Master’s Degree from Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism.

« Article List

Posted by Father
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 03:40

Judge Kathryn Baur, Administrative and Family Court Judge, Kings County, New York.
 
In a family court matter, this Judge refused to provide access to the other party salary information. I asked for this information twice in court, to which she concurred that it is my right to, and she blatantly refused to provide this info. Moreover, She provided a number in writing for final payment in court and later increased the amount. I HAVE PROOF OF THIS.
 
She would deliberately ask questions of no consequence to prolong a case in order for one party to incur cost.
 
After numerous appearances in her courtroom, she finally opined that she does not understand “FOREIGN ACCENTS”.
 
This judge has no place in a courtroom.

Posted by THE CRIME REPORT FOLLOW UP: THE CRISIS IN FAMILY COURT « Family Court in America
Sunday, August 01, 2010 06:56

[…] Another article looked at the systemic issues behind the chaotic and overburdened courtrooms that manage these emotional cases.  The contributing factors include: a dearth of judges caused by budget constraints; parents that represent themselves, thus backlogging the system with procedural mistakes; the explosion of custody disputes in cases with adoptive gay parents; and the high percentage of children born to single parents who are requesting child support. Together these have narrowed the average time a judge spends on a family court case to 3.5 minutes, according to a report by the New York State Senate Committee on the Judiciary. […]

Posted by asmith
Saturday, January 23, 2010 10:47

Divorcing families have responsibilities that are best managed and formulated by themselves with support. The whole idea that a judge can help that process is completely wrong in my opinion. On the whole judges order fathers to pay child support and mothers to have custody. Very very bad. It’s a blunt instrument in my opinion and makes a poor situation worse. There is no motivation to resolve the divorce problems and deal with the family issues. If an alcoholic went to the probate court maybe he would be ordered to stop drinking. That is how probate courts work. NO the alcoholic goes to AA meetings for two years and maybe he gets it and stops drinking. So what is the role of probate courts? They are a blunt instrument for people in need just like alcoholics. There was a time when lobotomy was popular and there should be a time when probate courts resemble the registry of motor vehicles.

Posted by Crisis in the Family Court - Paul Raeburn - Paul Raeburn - True/Slant
Thursday, January 07, 2010 08:36

[…] That’s one of the disturbing conclusions of a story published today on The Crime Report. […]

Posted by Do we need more Family Court Judges in SC? « SC Access To Justice Weblog
Wednesday, December 30, 2009 02:10

[…] Court Judges in SC? This is the question that recently arose in New York.  According to this post, the New York State Senate Judiciary Committee recommended immediately adding 21 family court […]

Posted by Laurence Dopkin, MD
Monday, December 28, 2009 02:44

Having psychiatrically evaluated and treated hundreds of children and families having legal issues, I would agree with Judge Duggan with respect to the need for more interdisciplinary programs involving interface with mental health providers. “Seat of the pants” judgments are usually not in the service of the family from a psychologic perspective and may ignore salient psychosocial issues which have not come to the courts’ attention.

Posted by Brian Glenn
Monday, December 28, 2009 08:37

Would the problem be lessened if more assets were employed towards the family dynamic?

TCR at a Glance

Crime and Prison Population Fall in N.C.

new & notable November 21, 2014

A series of justice reinvestment reforms in North Carolina have created a more efficient system, according to a report by the non-profit ...

Does 'Right-to-Carry' Lead to More Crime?

new & notable November 20, 2014

Laws that allow concealed weapons in public are associated with higher rates of aggravated assault, rape, robbery and murder, according t...

BJS: Crimes Against the Elderly on the Rise

new & notable November 14, 2014

Violent victimizations of Americans 65 or older increased 27 percent from 2003 to 2013, according to a new study by the federal Bureau of...