Archives

Thursday, April 16, 2009 01:17

Columbine: Outcasts Seeking "Honor"

04.11.09columbine

On April 20, 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold entered their Colorado high school and killed 12 of their classmates, then turned their guns on themselves. Ten years later, former Los Angeles Times reporter Jeff Kass's book, "Columbine: A True Crime story, a victim, the killers and the nation's search for answers," looks back at the school shooting that has become shorthand for suburban teenage depravity. The Crime Report asked Kass to explore some of the issues that still simmer.

For a guide to other media coverage of the anniversary, click here.


The Crime Report: Why do you believe the two boys did what they did?


Jeff Kass: If I had to sum up 336 pages and ten years into one word, I’d say it was vengeance.


Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were angry that they were at the bottom rung of the social ladder. And Columbine High School was a symbol of the social order that put them there.


Eric and Dylan, I believe, were above average in intelligence and had high expectations for themselves. That ramped up their anger because their lowly status was therefore a huge drop. I also point out in the book that Columbine and other school shootings occur in suburbs and small towns. If you’re an outcast like Eric and Dylan high school is the only game in town and a loser feels like a loser through and through. There are no (or few) alternative outlets to find your self-esteem.


Eric and Dylan, because of their mental states, were unable to recognize the friends they did have. Dylan was blinded by his depression and Eric by his rage. I say that specifically because some psychologists have given Dylan a post-mortem diagnosis of depression (although it is not unanimous) and Eric has been given a diagnosis of psychopath. Psychopaths are not typically violent. Deceit is their trademark. But Eric, at least in his Web postings, openly projected his anger and violence.


TCR: How would you rate the media coverage of Columbine in the immediate aftermath and the years since?


Kass: This is a very important question. There almost seems an attempt to rewrite history and journalists appear to be taking a giddy satisfaction in criticizing their own profession.


As the 10-year anniversary stories on Columbine arrive, one common theme is that the media got its initial reporting wrong. That is true. Yet the public record was also corrected pretty quickly.


 The Los Angeles Times, for example, heralded the revelation in a story this month that Columbine student Cassie Bernall was not shot dead because she said she believed in God. That (false) story did go worldwide in the months after Columbine. Bernall’s mother wrote a book, She Said Yes: The Unlikely Martyrdom of Cassie Bernall.


For months after the shootings, media reports did incorrectly tell that story. (And I would add it wasn’t necessarily sloppy reporting, but rather not enough access to investigative information.) But on Sept. 23, 1999, The Denver Post, citing Salon.com, noted “‘key investigators’ doubt the widely reported story that 17-year-old Cassie Bernall was slain because she told the killers, as a gun was held to her head, that she believed in God.” The next day the Rocky Mountain News ran a story with the headline, “Accounts Differ on Question to Bernall: Columbine Shooting Victim May Not Have Been Asked whether She Believed in God.” Ultimately, we would learn it was another girl who actually said she believed in God.


The Los Angeles Times (where I worked for many years) in part faults the media that parachuted in and out of Columbine. But The Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News didn’t parachute in. Then again, they never left. These two local papers stuck with the Columbine story and, in the case of Bernall, found that initial reports were wrong and corrected the story within a few months.


The Los Angeles Times, ten years later, indicates we are just learning that the original reports on the Bernall story were wrong. Why the Times thought we are just learning that, I don't know. Maybe the Times didn't stick with the story. Maybe they didn't check the clips. I don't know for sure.


TCR: Some have theorized that economic woes trigger most mass shootings. Do you agree?


Kass: I am not familiar with this theory, but on the surface, I do not give it much credence because I do not recall coming across any mentions by school shooters, their writings, or others that this was a factor. Also, school shootings and mass shootings seem to have been steady over the past ten years, despite economic ups and downs.


TCR:  Have we learned anything about what drives people to engage in mass killing sprees?


Kass: School shootings overwhelmingly occur in the South and West. In these regions, there is a ‘Culture of Honor’ whereby if you feel your honor has been violated (in this case, through your outcast status) violence is considered an appropriate response. There is also the issue that school shootings occur in suburbs and small towns. Here, outrage is directed at the school as the center of social life and a symbol of the society that has wronged them. In the inner-city, violence is directed at specific targets: the rival gang member, the other drug dealer, etc.


Recent headlines show adult shooters unleashing in small towns and cities. A rampage through two Alabama small towns; another in Carthage, N.C.; and now Binghamton, N.Y. Across the Atlantic, last month the Winnenden, Germany school shooting took place in a town of 27,000. I have not kept up with developments in the German case, but at first glance, I wonder whether the lack of an outlet in a small town or suburb linked the shooters at Columbine and Winnenden.


TCR: Did Columbine teach us anything about how to prevent school shootings?


Kass: Schools struck by shootings have reacted with stricter law enforcement such as more school resource officers, but also instilling a greater sense of community. They have added student programs to emphasize character traits such as respect, fairness, and caring. Various campuses have added more counselors, and more teacher training on conflict resolution. Some educators and others have pushed for smaller schools under the notion that they will promote closer ties among students and faculty (although such schools also have their critics).


TCR: Based on your reporting, should we have expected someone to take action that could have stopped the Columbine massacre?

Kass: The Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office had 15 contacts regarding Harris and/or Klebold beginning over two years before Columbine, including reports of violent Web pages that Harris had created. Investigators didn’t have to predict they would undertake a school shooting, but simply connect the dots and come down harder on the two. For example, investigators, wrote a draft affidavit for a search warrant for Harris’ home a year before Columbine but never took it before a judge.

 

 

 

Email this post »

Fellows Stories

Resources from the Conference

Conference Audio

Related Resources: Article, Guns, Juvenile Justice, School Shootings
« Return to list page
Your name: Your Email:
Add a Comment:

captcha
please type in the letters in the image



Posted by Columbine Culture of Honor « Writingcolumbine’s Blog
Sunday, April 26, 2009 04:25

[…] Q and A was for The Crime Report a well-respected Web site that covers criminal justice and journalism issues. The Q and A drew on […]

Posted by Ben Leichtling
Saturday, April 18, 2009 11:26

In the space of five days, we honor Jackie Robinson’s finally breaking into the major leagues and we also memorialize Eric Harris and Dylan Klebolt’s massacre at Columbine High School ten years ago. They each faced a failed system – but in opposite directions – and they illustrate character and courage – but at opposite ends of the spectrum.

The stories about what was done and said to Jackie Robinson fill volumes. I was born in Brooklyn and was old enough to go to Ebbets Field to see Robinson play in his second year. The insults, curses and threats from the players and fans were still going on then.

The rotten system that kept Robinson out of baseball and harassed him for years was full of anger, hatred and the very real possibility of killing him and his family.

Eric Harris and Dylan Klebolt faced a rotten system on the other extreme. They were allowed to be violent, destructive and threaten classmates, but instead of being removed from contact with other students who were their victims, the two were coddled.

A generation in charge of the school and the police falsely believed that if you kept extremely troubled kids in contact with the rest of us and gave them lots of counseling, the troubled kids would stop being crazy bullies. Harris and Klebolt showed a generation what the price was for living that false educational philosophy; each one of those psychopaths could kill about ten innocent people.

We still haven’t righted the system. Thousands of innocent kids are bullied and harassed at school each day while society, the legal system and school principals don’t stop the bullying juvenile delinquents, psychopaths and psychotics.

Jackie Robinson had the character and courage to endure and surmount far worse than the bullying that is claimed to have pushed Harris and Klebolt over the edge. Robinson didn’t give up or explode.

Neither Harris nor Klebolt had character or courage. Bullying didn’t push them over the edge. They ran willingly and repeatedly right to the edge and then jumped off. None of the adults stopped them or removed them.

When will we start protecting the rest of us from the bullies and crazies?

Disclosure: In addition to having six children, growing up in Brooklyn and living in Denver, I’m a practical, pragmatic coach and consultant. I’ve written books of case studies, “Parenting Bully-Proof Kids” and “How to Stop Bullies in their Tracks.” Check out my website and blog at BulliesBeGone (http://BulliesBeGone.com).

Posted by Ben Leichtling
Saturday, April 18, 2009 11:25

Whose fault was the killings at Columbine High School? And how can we help our children resist bullies, not become bullies themselves and thrive after horrible killings?

Seven of the most common targets of blame are:
1. The bullies who pushed Harris and Klebolt over the edge.
2. The parents of the bullies who didn’t stop their children.
3. The school principal who didn’t stop the bullying of Harris and Klebolt, or stop the earlier violence of the killers.
4. The parents of the killers who didn’t raise their kids better and didn’t had them incarcerated or committed.
5. Harris and Klebolt were simply psychopathic, psychotic killers.
6. A society that is violent and corrupt.
7. A society that has lost its connection with God.

Looking to blame and then fix one part of human life is the wrong way to go. Our efforts to change our school and legal system are necessary, useful and laudable, but they’re not a solution that will prevent future massacres.

Face reality. Bullies, psychopaths and killers are like the weather – they’ve always been with us and always will be. Assigning blame won’t change that.

The useful question for us is how we prepare our children and teenagers for a world in which they’ll face crazy, violent people.

We must teach our children not to use bullying tactics, and to be resilient in the face of bullying and to learn how to stop bullies in their tracks. Obviously, Harris and Klebolt never learned this. The hardest task for parents is to recognize when our children have gone bad and to do something about it.

Answering these difficult questions will help us teach our children better than hand wringing or assigning blame.

Disclosure: In addition to having six children and living in Denver, I’m a practical, pragmatic coach and consultant. I’ve written books of case studies, “Parenting Bully-Proof Kids” and “How to Stop Bullies in their Tracks.” Check out my website and blog at BulliesBeGone (http://BulliesBeGone.com).

Interactive Community »

Our Resources